Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Mens Genitals Why Are Womens Genitals Protected But Mens Aren't?

Why are womens genitals protected but mens aren't? - mens genitals

His circumcision illegal, but completely legal circumcision of the male. Both should be illegal.

12 comments:

Michael said...

I understand the point you are trying to make is that when a child is born, has an opinion on the adequacy of their penis by a process that is now considered medically necessary and is routinely done only to the United States are operated and other developed countries.

The thing is that you can not absolutely make male circumcision illegal for several reasons:
1) It is an important religious ritual for all Jews and all Muslims.
2) Some men want to have done by choosing as an adult.
3) It is sometimes necessary for medical reasons, but I think it should be a last resort, as often there are alternative treatments for problems such as phimosis.
4) In particular, the United States, the public sector are, on average, believe that it is a personal decision of the parents of the child can do. I am not entirely agree with, but never a law that makes it completely illegal in the United States.

nikynaky... said...

I also think it should be illegal because it should be as traumatic for poor children have to go through there. However, girls in other countries where circumcision is the right of peoples and religions that are not protected all the girls. The children are circumcised for religious hygiene, but the girls are sewn / circumcised, if they continue "........... for their virgins "potential husbands its definitely a world Mans.

Where's the Kaboom said...

The difference is that people may be circumcised for health reasons - a painful foreskin that can not be removed, for example. Even then he can still feel sexual pleasure and is able to urinate properly.

There are no medical reasons why a woman should be removed. These "measures" can often women without sexual problems, difficulty urinating or difficulties at work can lead to death.
Therefore, it is illegal.

That said, I do not think sex should be circumcised for religious reasons, unless expressly agreed.

Rise Against said...

This issue will only attack you people because of social habits.

The simple fact of the matter, it is illegal to remove the foreskin of a woman to remove, but not illegal, the male foreskin. The foreskin male and female has the same function and even the skin. In fact, in the equal rights only technically illegal today, but the children are not born from 18 to 2014 persons under the law of FGM. So really anyone who will need the challenge.

Some myths about.
Female circumcision is performed mainly by circumcised women. Most circumcised women who are circumcised happy.

Cultures that practice he medical benefits of circumcision. But male circumcision, there is no evidence any benefit. It is a merger of the United States assert that medical male circumcision. There have been some studies have shown that female circumcision reduces the rate of HIV transmission, but I think we should let the genitals of the individual.

It has also commissioned a study in the Sudan, the majoAuthority of women, FGM, infibulation, or Type 3 had undergone more sexual pleasure and orgasm, even if they culturally bound to hide these feelings.

Ultimately, you simply leave the genitals of children alone and let them do what you want, when you are grown up.

Here is an interesting video interview mothers Mussem on female circumcision:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5SpYbW1N ...

mr_gees1... said...

Female circumcision is a different person. Circumcision is the removal of the foreskin. I can see how it was in the days, but not so far. Bacteria and other things that caught between the head and the foreskin. And humidity that can cause infections such as yeast infection. Back in the day, he had no medical equipment or cleaning they do it now. It is also a regional thing. I wonder if it more often in places where water was abundant. Today is the traditional and / or religious practice. One thing that people forget is that the foreskin has a sensitivity that is so, since the missing part of his body. You still have the glans (penis head) So, you are still functioning well sexually.

Excision: the removal of the clitoris. The idea behind this is that women should feel no joy. Is Removed, the hope is to make the sexual appetite and less likely to cheat. I mean, that's what I expect. It is also an important element and a religious practice.

I assume that large differencesING between the two species is sexual pleasure. The men maintain sexual desire, but not women. Female circumcision is really a form of castration, in which male circumcision may be regarded as something aesthetically.

Some see circumcision as a cultural right of passage. There are some tribes where the man goes through a child turn into an adult. They have this ritual and what is not. In some cases, have someone do it for them. In the other child has to perform his own circumcision. Sometimes with a blunt knife.

The thing with male circumcision is felt. It is as cultural, religious, or look even cleaner, although this is not the case. It's more maintenance, but a certain person is a person itself, regardless of what looks like his penis. In any case, the perception of reality. Very few people look like a crime, so it is not illegal. How the West will "agree with me that circumcision is bad, while the tribal people who think one thing is perfectly normal to do so.

hiba said...

The circumcision is legal in the United States, but not in every country, my friend told me that while in Egypt for several years, no women are married to create such a painful experience for them and prevent them that have sex with men.

Susanne said...

Search for "circumcision" see no relationship between male circumcision and women. "The females are slaughtered and dressed men. There is a big difference.

liberal italienne goddess™ v1.02 said...

A male circumcision is a religious or medical procedures. It does nothing for women's health wise and religion is not recommended.

Ghost of Tom Joad said...

I agree, I'm glad I'm not circumcised. However, I doubt that fear will come from losing the Jewish vote.

robrobii... said...

The two are not identical, as the laws about them. The logical name.

phxAZ602 said...

I would be very angry if it was illegal. I do not want a penis that looks like an anteater. I am glad that I cut to

Lurch said...

I can only speak for myself, but I'm glad that I cut.

Post a Comment